The poster programme is now available online, it can be viewed by clicking on the Poster session on Tuesday 2nd September.
Preparing your poster for display at QuAMP 2025:
Authors must ensure that they have the necessary copyright / permissions for all material.
The poster boards are 181 cm high and 92 cm wide. They can accommodate A0 portrait (not landscape) and A1 landscape or portrait posters. Posters larger than the maximum size of the board can not be displayed.
Displaying your poster at QuAMP 2025:
Posters can be displayed from 9am on Tuesday 2nd September, and can remain on display until lunch on Thursday 4th September when they should be removed.
All poster presenters are kindly asked to make themselves available during the poster session to answer questions and facilitate discussion on their work.
Poster prizes
There will be a prize for the best poster at QuAMP 2025.
The best poster presentation (£100) will be awarded to any student from any country/institution who presents the most outstanding poster at the QuAMP 2025 conference, as judged by the criteria below. The runner-up poster presentation (2 x £50) will be awarded as above, to the students scoring the second- and third-highest scores.
Poster presenters who are eligible for a poster prize (i.e., they do not currently hold a PhD or equivalent qualification) are asked to confirm their eligibility when registering.
Scoring process:
Judges will use the scoring criteria below.
More than one judge will score each entrant.
A mixed panel of judges with different backgrounds/expertise will be appointed by the organisers and allocated to posters. No one may judge anyone from their own institution or any student that they have a connection with.
Judges are allowed to ask questions during the poster session.
Marks will be collated by the conference organiser, or a nominated representative. The decision of the conference organisers will be final; feedback on posters will not be given.
Scoring criteria:
Does the poster cover important concepts without being overcomplicated?
Is the motivation of the topic clear?
Are the key methods and results clearly explained?
Are they illustrated with relevant examples and figures?